[nama] Re: Singleton branch passes all tests
- From: Joel Roth <joelz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:22:46 -1000
Hi Julien,
As usual, I tend to be optimistic about the time
for various refactoring tasks.
Looks like 'passing all tests' is only moderately hopeful
news.
However, I've found and reviewed 54 potential variable name
collisions, and fixed some seven cases in which a lexical variable
declared inside a subroutine interferes with access
to a same-named singleton.
I should have done this before, however the script I wrote
for the purpose wasn't working properly... until I rewrote
it today.
Hoping for the best,
Joel
--
Joel Roth
Other related posts:
