[nama] Should track caching cache/uncache fades, too?

  • From: Joel Roth <joelz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:31:47 -1000

Hi Fading Namites!

If so, effect chains will need to accommodate fades.

It would certainly be easier to do the opposite:
to *disable* fades during caching, and re-enable
them afterwards.

It's not necessary to cache fades in terms of CPU, as 
envelopes aren't very expensive.

One might conceivably want to cache fades for permanence.

As things stand, if a fade is on a cached track, its
effect will be duplicated, as the new WAV file will
already contain the fade.

I'm leaning towards *not* caching fades.

Cheers,


-- 
Joel Roth

Other related posts: