[nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-)
- From: Joel Roth <joelz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:46:05 -1000
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:34:10PM +0200, Julien Claassen wrote: > Hello Joel! > I like the first two forms you presented, those with > other_project. It has a similar syntax to link_track - in its > extended form. You know I like this kind of behaviour. Yes, you've taught me a lot about the benefits of regular syntax, and you did a great job of reviewing and regularizing our commands. I think that some of the most heated (and enjoyable) communications we've had have been disussions of syntax! Joel > Warm regards > Julien > -- Joel Roth
- Follow-Ups:
- [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-)
- From: alex stone
- [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-)
- References:
- [nama] One over on the big boys(TM) :-)
- From: Julien Claassen
- [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-)
- From: alex stone
- [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-)
- From: Joel Roth
- [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-)
- From: Julien Claassen
- [nama] One over on the big boys(TM) :-)
Other related posts:
- » [nama] One over on the big boys(TM) :-) - Julien Claassen
- » [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-) - alex stone
- » [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-) - Joel Roth
- » [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-) - Julien Claassen
- » [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-) - Joel Roth
- » [nama] Re: One over on the big boys(TM) :-) - alex stone