[nama] Re: Development update

  • From: "S. Massy" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:32:54 -0500

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:11:31PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> I'm currently working on the 'bypass' branch on github.
Is it ready for testing, or will et eat my brains?

> Git:
> Massy made a reasonable argument to break up State.json into
> separate files for each object type: in the git diffs,
> you'll know by the filename, exactly which type of object is
> involved.
> My (hackish?) alternative is to do for all classes what I
> already do for most: include the class in the object when I
> serialize.
I still think the first alternative would make for pretty diffs, but the
second one seems fine as well, and probably better, if splitting up the
state file would mean a significant performance hit or increase in code


Other related posts: