[nama] Re: An Example?
- From: Julien Claassen <julien@xxxxxxxx>
- To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:03:52 +0200 (CEST)
Hi Kevin!
I used different projects. I recorded one part per project. This was the
easiest and clearest way to manage it. For there were tempo changes.
Later I mixed down every part. I used effect_chains, effect_profiles and
similar track names to keep track of everything and keep it homogenous. Then I
created a master project. This master project just consisted of linked tracks.
The tracks I linked were the Mixdown track of all the parts. So they followed
new Mixdown versions. there I could shift tracks to appropriate times.
The beautiful thing is, that I have really seperate parts, nothing that
overwhelms me while looking at it. It also won't overload my CPU. Although I
could think of other ways to not overload the CPU. It would still seem too
much of an effrot, when Nama offers this way of working. :-)
Also beautiful about this solutions, I can slowly go through and record. I
can create temporary mixdowns at different stages and they will all fit
together, once a Mixdown is added to the master projected and shifted to its
appropriate time.
I hope that helps, if not continue asking about the uncertain points.
Kindly yours
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
Other related posts:
