[muscle] Re: signalowner
- From: Jeremy Friesner <jaf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:52:03 -0700
Hi Wim,
SignalOwner() is called by the MessageTransceiverThread object's internal
thread -- it does not (or at least, it should not) require that
GetNextEventFromInternalThread() be called first. So either something is
wrong, or you are misintepreting the output you are seeing. I don't know
enough to say anything more; if you send me some example source code I can
look at it and try and figure out what is going on.
-Jeremy
On Saturday 04 June 2005 12:43, VANHERP Wim wrote:
> I have the impression that the virtual function SignalOwner() from
> messagetransceiverthread is only called after i have started the
> function GetNextEventFromInternalThread. What should mean that i have
> to start this function a first time to start receiving, and then each
> time afterwards i have received the message. =20
> Is that correct ?
- References:
- [muscle] Re: signalowner
- From: VANHERP Wim
Other related posts:
- » [muscle] signalowner
- » [muscle] Re: signalowner
- » [muscle] Re: signalowner
- » [muscle] Re: signalowner
- » [muscle] Re: signalowner
- » [muscle] Re: signalowner
- » [muscle] Re: signalowner
- [muscle] Re: signalowner
- From: VANHERP Wim