[muscle] Re: Bug in Flattenable::FlattenToDataIO ?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jeremy Friesner <jaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Yes, it looks like you are correct.  I will fix that for the next muscle
>  release.

Thanks.

>  Regarding the alternative C# library, how does yours differ from the one
>  included in the muscle archive?

1) I dislike the Java way of naming things like lowerCamelCase. .NET
tends toward UpperCamelCase.
2) A What class that can convert between "ANYT" and 1095653716 automatically.
3) Field access is very similar to array access. msg[ "foo" ] = "bar";
 msg[ "bar" ][ 3 ] = 4.5; However, I don't have the AddBool type
functions. I hope to include those soon.
4) Can flatten/unflatten to byte[] as well as BinaryReader/Writer.

In most other respects its very similar to the included one. I haven't
worked with the server side nor async code, tho both topics I'd like
to explore at some point.

I think what I'm going to do is spend some time cleaning, documenting,
and posting a quick zip of its current state. Then I'll spend some
time setting up a nice area on my website or thru hosted access. I
have a number of projects that I'd like to open to the public.

-- 
Joel Lucsy
"The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space
program." -- Larry Niven

Other related posts: