[muglo] Re: sound
- From: Tee Cashmore <tee.cashmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:12:37 -0500
Martin Albinger wrote:
>My experience is the opposite 9.2.2 is the most stable MacOS I
>have used (can't speak to 10 cause I'm not using it yet)
>
>What isn't "true" about 9.2 - does it do everything that 9.04
>did? If so then one is no truer than the other.
>
>The fact that it has been optimized to work "classically" does
>change the fact it is still OS 9 and very good OS 9.
>
>
>Martin
>
>
>
Thank you Martin. I cannot recall the number of Mac Gurus who hailed the
advent of 9.1, which included a number of upgrades, improvements etc. My
8.6 was good with an occasional crash, but no crashes at all with 9.1.
TTFN,
TeeC
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://muglo.on.ca/pages/members.html#Joinmuglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://muglo.on.ca/
- References:
- [muglo] Re: sound
- From: Rich
- [muglo] Re: sound
- From: Martin Albinger
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- » [muglo] Re: sound
- [muglo] Re: sound
- From: Rich
- [muglo] Re: sound
- From: Martin Albinger