[muglo] Re: no coup intended
- From: Paul Thomas <paul_thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:07:01 -0400
In fact as others have made their intentions publicly, I should mention
that (as I said to Tee) I would run for President if Tim decided not to
do so! We have not heard from Tim publicly, so I don't know if he
intimated anything to Tee as the other two did so publicly? We will
just have to await what Tee reveals!
Paul
On Jun 16, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Paul Thomas wrote:
> I also responded to Tee, as requested in his original message - that
> nominations should be sent to him and indeed I did send my
> suggestions!! Just in case anyone thought I didn't care - as a long
> time member of MUGLO, I did!!
>
> Paul
>
> On Jun 16, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Doug Bale wrote:
>
>> I don't see the objection to my comment about the number of people
>> responding to nominations. Ted Medzon proposed a vote of confidence in
>> the present executive. Jordan Smith seconded it. The only other vote
>> on the motion was my own "Aye."
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> For information about MUGLO: http://www.freewebs.com/muglo
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
For information about MUGLO: http://www.freewebs.com/muglo
-----------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- [muglo] Re: no coup intended
- From: Tim Kearn
- References:
- [muglo] no coup intended
- From: Doug Bale
- [muglo] Re: no coup intended
- From: Paul Thomas
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] no coup intended
- » [muglo] Re: no coup intended
- » [muglo] Re: no coup intended
- » [muglo] Re: no coup intended
- » [muglo] Re: no coup intended
- [muglo] Re: no coup intended
- From: Tim Kearn
- [muglo] no coup intended
- From: Doug Bale
- [muglo] Re: no coup intended
- From: Paul Thomas