[muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Martin Albinger <max@xxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:37:26 -0500
On Nov 21, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Dave Bonhoff wrote:
> I'm sorry for having expressed my opinions to the list and apologize
> for the ensuing off topic messages.
> I'll be replying to Eric off list.
> Dave
>
> On 20-Nov-05, at 11:33, Eric Dunbar wrote:
>
>> Now, how's that for a rant.
>
>
Well I actually enjoyed the off topic rants personally, so need to be
sorry on my part. It confirms to some extent what my own opinions are
and why I hold them, it lets me see how others view (or perceive) a
particular topic and gosh are computer and software all we can talk
about? We may be muglo but we do have other lives!
I really thought that somebody would jump all over the penny issue - at
least it's a more neutral topic ;)
Martin
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://muglo.on.ca/Pages/joinus.html
Our Archives can be viewed at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/muglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://muglo.on.ca/
- Follow-Ups:
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: William R McGrath
- References:
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Gerhard
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Martin Albinger
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Dave Bonhoff
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Dave Bonhoff
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: William R McGrath
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Gerhard
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Martin Albinger
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Dave Bonhoff
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Dave Bonhoff