[muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Paul Thomas <paul_thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:33:09 -0500
On Nov 20, 2005, at 11:33 AM, Eric Dunbar wrote:
> No kidding.
>
And 'VAT' all started by talking about purchase taxing!! I Must say
that I preferred the VAT system in Britain - you paid what it said -
not after what was added on - an added value tax!!
Paul
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://muglo.on.ca/Pages/joinus.html
Our Archives can be viewed at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/muglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://muglo.on.ca/
- References:
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Gerhard
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Martin Albinger
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Dave Bonhoff
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Gerhard
- [muglo] Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Martin Albinger
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Dave Bonhoff
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Eric Dunbar