[muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Martin Albinger <max@xxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:36:21 -0500
On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:12 PM, Tee Cashmore wrote:
>
> On 21-Nov-05, at 3:33 PM, William R McGrath wrote:
>
>> There must be some sort of twelve-step program for you Eric. I hope
>> find it.
>>
>> Bill
>
> Well said Bill! Don't bank on it happening though.
> TTFN,
And I hope that it doesn't! We need at least one person to get
everyone up in arms (letters?) Without the <rants> there being nothing
to talk about! Hey maybe we could come up with a list of topics for
the next 6 to 8 weeks:
Suggestions:
How should the PM handle the NAFTA issue? charge more for our oil, keep
it to ourselves?
and what about hard wood? is that a none issue? all hear about is the
soft stuff
and corn!! what about those subsidies in the US or Europe for that
matter!!!
and marijuana seeds, what about those - I say more hemp for cloth and
rope and lubrication etc
Martin
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://muglo.on.ca/Pages/joinus.html
Our Archives can be viewed at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/muglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://muglo.on.ca/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: William R McGrath
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Tee Cashmore
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- » [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: William R McGrath
- [muglo] Re: [muglo]<rant> VATs: was Re: USB 250-meg Zip with 10.3.9--Again!
- From: Tee Cashmore