Re: [muglo] [muglo]" Post needs approval"

Um...last I checked I wasn't a moderator :)
Can someone fix this email problem please? Thanks in advance.> From: 
dougsamu@xxxxxxxxxx> To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [muglo] Fwd: muglo: 
sara-marshall@xxxxxxxxxx post needs approval> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:55:53 
-0500> > Editing previous posts to the pertinent info is recommended. Most > 
easily, remove the signature lines. The post has been edited to break > up the 
21 line block.> Begin forwarded message:> > From: FreeLists Mailing List 
Manager <ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Date: February 25, 2008 2:14:43 PM GMT-05:00> 
To: dougsamu@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: muglo: sara-marshall@xxxxxxxxxx post needs 
approval> Reply-To: sara-marshall@xxxxxxxxxx> > This message was received for a 
list you are a moderator on, and> was marked for moderation due to the 
following reason:> Overquoting: 21 lines quoted in a block (12 max allowed)> > 
To approve this message and have it go out on the list, forward this to> 
muglo-repost@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > If you wish to decline the post, change the 
'apppost' below to > 'delpost'.> If you wish to edit the post, change it to 
'modpost' and edit the > message> as needed - not all mail programs will work 
with modpost.> > DO NOT DELETE THE FOLLOWING LINE. Ecartis needs it.> // 
apppost 47C313A3:6DE0.1:zhtyb> > From sara-marshall@xxxxxxxxxx Mon Feb 25 
14:14:43 2008> Return-Path: <sara-marshall@xxxxxxxxxx>> X-Original-To: 
muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Delivered-To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Received: from 
localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])> by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies 
Mail Multiplex) with > ESMTP id 2C01A80CE89> for <muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 25 
Feb 2008 14:14:43 -0500 (EST)> Received: from turing.freelists.org 
([127.0.0.1])> by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, 
port > 10024)> with ESMTP id 28107-02-2 for <muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;> Mon, 25 Feb 
2008 14:14:43 -0500 (EST)> Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com > 
(smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81])> by turing.freelists.org 
(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with > SMTP id D9CF180CEED> for 
<muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:14:41 -0500 (EST)> Received: (qmail 
11150 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2008 19:14:39 -0000> DomainKey-Signature: 
a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;> s=s1024; d=rogers.com;> 
h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Mime-Version:In-Reply- > 
To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer- > 
Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;> > b > = > 
yUdv0AAuiB6mDrN3rt8LjU8vpKhHA8w0bAhnurpkZV2wEWvhfb9oViekQK1JpD1G0fMK7aXb897t1pgSVGSWFy1k
 > /kP1GHuv2z4L6NvPrBJ50vP59uHas35gnDysNsPbq/pSynzkEC/ > 
2yRdeiNpI1bAT9/97vK7aEOqwkt64tfE= ;> Received: from unknown (HELO 
?192.168.1.100?) (sara- > marshall@xxxxxxxxxx@99.249.90.128 with plain)> by 
smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2008 19:14:39 > -0000> 
X-YMail-OSG: > 
zJk3ofQVM1kad9kY4wLu07PYJk17ZtPmXY0.yb5NXPcJTqHq8ALHgnR5.rAUmy4rLQ--> 
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework 
v753)> In-Reply-To: <ecartis-02252008122226.9331.1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> References: 
<ecartis-02252008122226.9331.1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Content-type: text/plain; 
charset=US-ASCII> Message-Id: 
<DAD2AA39-CB80-4A4D-8F2C-672C99B4D329@xxxxxxxxxx>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
8bit> From: Sara Marshall <sara-marshall@xxxxxxxxxx>> Subject: Re: [muglo] 
muglo: josephnolan1@xxxxxxx post needs approval> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 
14:14:41 -0500> To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753)> 
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain> > Thanks Joe,> I 
checked and our phones are only 2.4 ghz. I guess we'll invest in> some new 
phones. Know where we could find a good deal?> Was your other suggestion not to 
plug the phone into a power bar with> a bunch of other stuff?> Thanks again.> 
Sara> > On 25-Feb-08, at 12:22 PM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote:> >> 
Sara,> >> I have been using it (Vonage) successfully for years. We use it> >> 
with Rogers a wi-fi router and 4 computers in the house with no> >> degradation 
of service. We did have some slowdown (no a standstill)> >> when we were using 
2.4 or 5.8 ghz cordless phones, but since we> >> switched to a 6.0, that 
problem has been eliminated.> >>> > >> On 25-Feb-08, at 11:45 AM, Sara Marshall 
wrote:> > >>> >>> >>> Does anyone else use Vonage? We use Vonage and find that 
whenever we> >>> attempt to download anything - music, video, softwear updates 
etc.> >>> the quality of the phone line seems to really suffer -> >>> >> // 
eompost 47C2F952:2473.1:zhtyb> > >> 
-----------------------------------------------------------> >> MUGLO 
information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>> >> Manage list subscription 
options at <http://www.freelists.org/list/> >> muglo>> >> 
-----------------------------------------------------------> > >>> >> > // 
eompost 47C313A3:6DE0.1:zhtyb> >> > ___cartoon life 
blog___<http://home.golden.net/~samu>___more otherstuff> 
__<http://dougsamu.wordpress.com/>__<http://dougrogers.wordpress.com/>> > > > 
-----------------------------------------------------------> MUGLO information 
at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>> Manage list subscription options at 
<http://www.freelists.org/list/muglo>> 
-----------------------------------------------------------
_________________________________________________________________


-----------------------------------------------------------
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage list subscription options at <http://www.freelists.org/list/muglo>
-----------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: