Not for me: "We learned how to use IMovie, then was told that for our purposes we would need to use Final Cut." It appears to me they were told iMovie wouldn't produce a satisfactory quality. This was backed up later by the statement: "It is just that we were told that iMovie wouldn't view well on a newer TV." I can understand that Final Cut might produce some special effects that iMovie can't, but to tell a customer that iMovie high definition is not as good as Final Cut high definition? Maybe some more clarification is needed from the new members. As I said before, I would like to know for my own future reference why spending $1,000 on hardware upgrades will only lead to more software upgrades. so this is why we are going with Final Cut Express On Mar 31, 2009, at 10:15 PM, Douglas Plumley wrote: > ... > > maybe a re-read of the third sentence of the second paragraph in the > original email might add some more perspective > > ... > --- > MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo> > Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi > > > > > Wayne Dobson pwdobson@xxxxxxxxxx (519) 474-1253 res. (519) 860-2725 cell --- MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo> Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>