[muglo] Re: dead computer
- From: Chris <kristoff1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 15:44:52 -0400
on 10/7/03 2:19 PM, tee.cashmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx at tee.cashmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> I have to totally agree with Eric ; pause for astonished sighs; Because the
> 475 has a built in monitor it is expensive to fix & difficult to upgrade. A
> good used cpu is inexpensive, ($100-400) and a monitor is $80-200. To repair
> an LC 475 is $60 just to look at it and what you describe sounds expensive to
> fix. HTH.
> btw this missive is coming to you via Wooton in the Cotswolds of England.
> TTFN,
> TeeC
I think you're thinking of the 575 Tee. The 475 doesn't have a built-in
monitor (it's only 2.2" high)
Chris
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://muglo.on.ca/pages/members.html#Joinmuglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://muglo.on.ca/
- Follow-Ups:
- [muglo] Re: dead computer
- From: Jim Taylor
- References:
- [muglo] Re: dead computer
- From: tee.cashmore
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- » [muglo] Re: dead computer
- [muglo] Re: dead computer
- From: Jim Taylor
- [muglo] Re: dead computer
- From: tee.cashmore