[muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- From: Gerhard Kuhn <gerhardk@xxxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:36:16 -0400
You may not want to or not able to upgrade that machine to XP as it
requires quite a bit of memory and a fast processor to run well
enough to make the machine useable. The machine that is running
Windows 2000 should be fine to upgrade but if it is working for you
there is not much you will gain for the expense incurred.
Gerhard
On Aug 14, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Theresa Roth wrote:
> One PC has Windows 95,
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://www.freewebs.com/muglo/joinus.html
Our Archives can be viewed at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/muglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://www.freewebs.com/muglo/
- Follow-Ups:
- [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- From: Theresa Roth
- References:
- [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- From: Theresa Roth
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- » [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- From: Theresa Roth
- [muglo] Re: WINDOWS XP
- From: Theresa Roth