[muglo] Re: System stability (was: sound)
- From: Martin Albinger <max@xxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:16:54 -0500
>>Jim Laycock wrote:
> In my view, the introduction of CarbonLib with MacOS 9.1 caused a host of
> incompatibilies that were never fully resolved even with 9.2.2.
Based on your experiences it ( sounds - again to keep it on
topic!) like you have the last word. I can only go by what I have
experienced,
> The OS's that I had the greatest long-term stability with (on dozens of
> machines ranging from PPC 7200's to G3/300s) were 8.6 and 9.0.4
I wonder if the wide mix of OSs is contributory here. With the
wider mix up to 9.2.2 introducing significantly more variables.
Based on your experieince do you think a single OS version
(either 7, 8 or 9) would be more stable than having a mixed bag?
> Personally, I have been using Mac OS X on my TiBook/500 for 18 months (and I
> find that 10.2.x is in general less stable than 10.1.x -- despite the hype.)
>
I think I'll just sit at 9.2.2 for a bit longer. It's working for me!
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://muglo.on.ca/pages/members.html#Joinmuglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://muglo.on.ca/
- References:
- [muglo] Re: System stability (was: sound)
- From: Jim Laycock
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] Re: System stability (was: sound)
- » [muglo] Re: System stability (was: sound)
- » [muglo] Re: System stability (was: sound)
- » [muglo] Re: System stability (was: sound)
- [muglo] Re: System stability (was: sound)
- From: Jim Laycock