[muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- From: Tee Cashmore <teecashmore@xxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:03:49 -0500
On 16-Feb-06, at 2:23 PM, Dave Bonhoff wrote:
> Tim,
>
> I'm confused by your email. You appear to be using the iMac as your
> baseline for cost and features. Are you trying to get the
> functionality of an iMac at a lower price? Do you want to trade a
> feature for another? The main point being processors. Then mini is
> an old G4, with a small and slow HD, etc. You want to run iLife '06
> which will obviously run much better on an iMac G5 (if you can find
> one) or the new Intel Core Duo machine. ....
=B1Aren't you missing the whole point? The base Mac Mini is $630, which=20=
is damn sight less than a G5! HDs are easy to replace, but why bother=20
when an external is cheaper & more functional?
TTFN,
TeeC
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://www.freewebs.com/muglo/joinus.html
Our Archives can be viewed at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/muglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://www.freewebs.com/muglo/
- Follow-Ups:
- [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- From: Dave Bonhoff
- References:
- [muglo] Mac Mini
- From: Tim Kearn
- [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- From: Dave Bonhoff
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- » [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- From: Dave Bonhoff
- [muglo] Mac Mini
- From: Tim Kearn
- [muglo] Re: Mac Mini
- From: Dave Bonhoff