[muglo] Re: Identifying off topic posts (was Re: SPAM Soapbox)
- From: Martin Albinger <max@xxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:37:50 -0400
Eric D wrote:
>>>Was our list consensus on off topic posts that OT or ot be
>>>encased in brackets thusly : [OT] or [ot]. Please correct me if
>>>I am wrong and I'll make adjustements to my filter.
>
>
> I'd argue spam discussions are relevant to *all* on-line computer-related
> lists ;)
>
By no means was I suggesting that spam was off topic! Since the
subject line was prefaced with (or included) the Off Topic
designator I wanted clarification on the consesus we had
previously reached regarding its use - setting my filter to
intercept [ot] or [OT] as compared to _ot_ or _OT_ (where the _
represents a space) or perhaps even :ot_ or :OT_ or :_ot_ or
:_OT_ then again it could be ....? :(
Martin
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://muglo.on.ca/pages/members.html#Joinmuglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://muglo.on.ca/
- Follow-Ups:
- [muglo] Re: Identifying off topic posts (was Re: SPAM Soapbox)
- From: Paul Thomas
- References:
- [muglo] Re: SPAM Soapbox
- From: Eric D
Other related posts:
- » [muglo] Re: Identifying off topic posts (was Re: SPAM Soapbox)
- » [muglo] Re: Identifying off topic posts (was Re: SPAM Soapbox)
- [muglo] Re: Identifying off topic posts (was Re: SPAM Soapbox)
- From: Paul Thomas
- [muglo] Re: SPAM Soapbox
- From: Eric D