[muglo] Re: Constitution and attendance

  • From: Doug Bale <dougbale@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:02:36 -0700 (PDT)

On Sat, 3/7/09, doug rogers <dougsamu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We'll have to wait to see how effective the
> 'bounce-default-to-unsubscribe' actually works, 
> because really it's only a measure of live email 
> addresses.


Well, yes, it is only that. But if someone who isn't attending meetings is also 
not reading the e-mails (because the e-mails are no longer getting to them, 
because the e-mail address they've given us is no long operative, in what way 
can they be continue to be considered even passively participating members? 
---
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>



Other related posts: