[moneytalks] Re: payment first
- From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
- To: <moneytalks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:00:53 -0400
We are wondering why those with regular payments of the same amount
would not prefer to use recurring transactions instead of entering
transactions by hand every time. When we first began developing Money
Talks, the item first concept made sence. But now, it seems like most of
this work could be done with recurring transactions. Thoughts?
Rob Meredith
>>> musicmaker365@xxxxxxxxxxx 04/05/05 12:00PM >>>
I agree, I would like the Payee to be first.
----- Original Message -----
From: "The Pardees" <fpardee@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <moneytalks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:02 PM
Subject: [moneytalks] payment first
> Hi,
> Having the amount shown before the payee or payer may be desirable
fore
> some users, however, in my case I have a number of debits and credits
that
> remain the same from month to month and having the payer or payee
come
> first with the amount of the last payment retained is much more
desirable.
> Is there a way the user could choose which he wants?
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- From: The Pardees
- [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- From: Roger Smith
Other related posts:
- » [moneytalks] payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- » [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- From: The Pardees
- [moneytalks] Re: payment first
- From: Roger Smith