[moneytalks] Re: payment first

I use recurring transactions often and successfully.  I'm basically an
amount first person, but I think it's because that's what you had to do in
adder and I could get use to it either way.

Rp

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
To: <moneytalks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 1:00 PM
Subject: [moneytalks] Re: payment first


> We are wondering why those with regular payments of the same amount
> would not prefer to use recurring transactions instead of entering
> transactions by hand every time. When we first began developing Money
> Talks, the item first concept made sence. But now, it seems like most of
> this work could be done with recurring transactions. Thoughts?
>
> Rob Meredith
>
> >>> musicmaker365@xxxxxxxxxxx 04/05/05 12:00PM >>>
> I agree, I would like the Payee to be first.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "The Pardees" <fpardee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <moneytalks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:02 PM
> Subject: [moneytalks] payment first
>
>
> > Hi,
> > Having the amount shown before the payee or payer may be desirable
> fore
> > some users, however, in my case I have a number of debits and credits
> that
> > remain the same from month to month and having the payer or payee
> come
> > first with the amount of the last payment retained is much more
> desirable.
> > Is there a way the user could choose which he wants?
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Other related posts: