[moneytalks] Re: Beta: Regarding transferring sub-parts ofsplit transactions to other accounts.
- From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
- To: <moneytalks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:14:23 -0400
We've pretty much decided to block all portions of a split. That was the
original intent; the fact that you can transfer any of them is a bug.
Rob Meredith
>>> steveziel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 08/24/06 08:56AM >>>
Rob,
Have you decided yet if you'll leave it as is or undo what it is
currently
doing?
----- Original Message -----
From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
To: <moneytalks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 7:30 AM
Subject: [moneytalks] Re: Beta: Regarding transferring sub-parts
ofsplit
transactions to other accounts.
> Sounds very far-fetched to us as well.
>
>>>> TheBlindAvenger@xxxxxxx 08/23/06 11:42PM >>>
> On Monday August 21, Steve Zielinski wrote:
>
> "For instance, you might have taken an amount from an
> ATM machine, and split that transaction, some going to pocket cash,
> some
> cash going to pay a credit card bill in cash at the bank, and some
> going to
> make
> a cash deposit into a savings account."
>
> I've never thought of transferring parts of a split to a
different
> account,
> because I would never handle the above situation in the manner
> described. I
> would get my pocket cash from the ATM. I would transfer money to my
> savings
> account via online
> banking and perform the transfer in Money Talks as well. In
addition,
> I
> would pay my credit card electronically and record the transaction
in
> Money
> Talks.
>
> Suzy
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.5/425 - Release Date:
8/22/2006
>
>
Other related posts:
