[modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: "Terry Lane" <tel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:10:14 +1000
...and it works a treat. I do most of my pistons that way.
> Al
>
> Good ol' LBSC used to recommend - instruct - that pistons should be half
screwed onto the piston
> rod. The other half should be a tight push fit, the reduced size being
the same as the OD of the
> thread. The screwed part was at the outer end, of course! That way
concentricity and security
> was assured.
>
> Regards
>
> Dave
> Saudi-Arabia-On-Sea
>
>
> --- Allen Messer <al_messer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Harry, I must confess to threading the piston rod the full length of the
piston plus the height
> > of the nut. If this is improper practice, what diameter shoulder should
be allowed for the
> piston
> > to butt against? And I do agree that the piston should be finish
turned on its own individual
> > rod.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new
Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
> MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
> modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject
line.
>
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Allen Messer
- References:
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: David Everett
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Allen Messer
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: David Everett