[modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Now Ga1 was 3½ versus 5
- From: "Eric Walker" <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 20:54:45 +0100
Hello Jem,
I agree with Harry, the prices for the 7 1/4" engines are excessive. The
last set of castings I bought cost £200 but this didn't include wheels as I
always use steel ones, because of the wear on a Tinkerbelle I built. You
should be able to build a narrow gauge 7 1/4" for less than £2000.
Eric Walker in cold & damp Nottinghamshire
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jem Harrison" <Jem.Harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 2:34 PM
Subject: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Now Ga1 was 3½ versus 5
> Hallo Harry,
>
> Having gone to a few G1MRA meetings, I thought I ought to join. All I
> have
> done in G1 is build four wagons, which were very satisfying to construct.
> Now fellow G1 members pull my leg about building an engine. As my wagons
> are all SDJR vehciles, the loco has to match, but old SDJR locos were
> small
> boilered types, and my impression is that live-steamers in G1 tend to be
> more reliable if they have adequate boilers. I think LBSC was very aware
> of
> the need for a sizeable boiler & firebox configuration in his design of
> Ayesha and Maisie. Thus I intend that my SDJR loco in G1 will be
> electrically driven, perhaps with batteries in the tender and controlled
> by
> a car key fob. (ducking for cover as a modeleng cruise missile heads my
> way!).
>
> I would rather do coal-fired steam in 3½ or perhaps 5-inch gauge. I have
> seen some very fine G1 live-steamers: a few Dees, a superb SECR 0-6-0 by
> Frank Norton utilizing the D twin cylinder layout, which he accomodated by
> giving the leading coupled wheels stub axles. Tom Barrett's locos, with
> single cylinders, are good runners. John Barrett's Jubilees and Castles
> have impressed as well. The Asters are very good, but ready built engines
> require owners with deep pockets.
>
> On the other hand, the big stuff doesn't come cheap. There are the
> machined
> parts for a 7½ Romulus for sale in our club at £2100. The seller tells me
> that the castings and other bits alone cost £1900 ! He is also selling a
> Polly 5 for £5000 is anyone is interested.
>
> Back to the drawing. It is to 10mm (I would rather 1/32, but the first
> wagon I built was from a kit and it was to 10mm, so I have stuck with
> that....besides wheels sets tend to be to 10mm). The prtotype is an SDJR
> "Scottie" 0-6-0, so nicknamed after the builders of the first batch being
> Neilsons of Glasgow. They are really tender versions of the Midland
> half-cab, 4ft 6½in wheels (13 spokes).
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Jem
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harry Wade" <hww@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:21 PM
> Subject: [modeleng] Now Ga1 was 3½ versus 5
>
>
>> At 09:29 AM 10/4/05 +0100, you wrote:
>>>I am currently drawing the tender for a loco in Gauge 1 (10mm - 1ft) -
>>>Jem
>>
>> Jem,
>> Which loco did you choose? I'm active in Ga1 myself. There is
>> ongoing friendly discussion amongst G1MRA members of which scale is
>> preferred, 1:32 or 10mm, with no resolution of course, but there is
>> unanimous opinion that 1:29, the scale which is currently used by
>> American
>> mfg Aristocraft is NOT preferred.
>> I'm also relatively active in 7.5"ga, and once upon a time a couple
>> of my fellow club members (Not Mr. Jesse!) had an "You're either with us,
>> or agin' us" attitude and couldn't seem to get past the idea that
>> dabbling
>> in more than one gauge,or any gauge but 7.5", was like cheating on your
>> wife. But they seem to have gotten over that.
>> There is a group of Swiss builders who have done SECR D-class 4-4-0s
>> in 10mm to a simply stunning level of detail.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Harry Wade
>>
>> MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
>>
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
>> modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject
>> line.
>>
>
>
> MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
> modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject
> line.
>
>
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- References:
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Re: [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Re: [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- From: JESSE LIVINGSTON
- [modeleng] Now Ga1 was 3½ versus 5
- From: Harry Wade
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Now Ga1 was 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Now Ga1 was 3½ versus 5
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Re: [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Re: [modeleng] Re: 3½ versus 5
- From: JESSE LIVINGSTON
- [modeleng] Now Ga1 was 3½ versus 5
- From: Harry Wade
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Now Ga1 was 3½ versus 5
- From: Jem Harrison