[modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: "John Pagett" <john_pagett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:03:02 +0100
Once upon a time, in days of yore, crossbows were pulled back into the
firing position by a cord tied around the waist and leaning backwards with
the feet holding the arms of the bow against the ground. This act was called
"spanning" the bow. Some bright spark invented a device with a square shaft
which was rotated to do the same thing, and the tool that fitted the square
shaft was called a spanner.
OT I know, but I couldn't resist sharing it with you.
Harry - did you mean a c spanner?
Cheers,
JohnP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Wade" <hww@xxxxxxxx>
To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 10:44 PM
Subject: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
At 02:30 PM 9/26/05 -0700, you wrote:
>Harry, down at the County Jailhouse Maintenance Dept.,
>we called them "Security Screwdrivers"--Spanners to
>our British brethern.
Al,
Yes, it's kind of a security fastener, but also a low-profile
fastener. There is a name for it, I just can't recall it at the moment.
Also, spanner (UK) = wrench (USA). Originally I think both terms
referred to tools with a fixed opening (like a crows foot or box end
wrench) but so far as I know, there as here, the term covers any
spanner/wrench, and it doesn't specifically describe what I'm talking about.
Regards,
Harry
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject
line.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.7/112 - Release Date: 26/09/2005
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade
- References:
- [modeleng] Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade
- [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- » [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade
- [modeleng] Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade
- [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade