[modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- From: Harry Wade <hww@xxxxxxxx>
- To: modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:03:55 -0600
At 09:41 PM 10/29/06 -0000, you wrote:
>Regarding S S where do we stand with super heater tubes? - E.W.
Eric,
"We", of course, varies by location, as does regulation, but generally
speaking because superheaters are "attachments" or fittings if you will,
they are not a part of the pressure vessel structure and are consummable
and renewable. The purpose of a test is to prove the pressure vessel
structure and not the fittings so superheaters will pass by.
Regards,
Harry Wade
Nashville Tennessee
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- References:
- [modeleng] A leaking ring - leaks no more
- From: psbr20252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [modeleng] Re: A leaking ring - leaks no more
- From: alan stepney
- [modeleng] SS Boiler
- From: Bede McCormack
- [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- From: kenny.macdougall
- [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- From: kenny.macdougall
- [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- From: Jesse Livingston
- [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- From: Eric Walker
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- » [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- [modeleng] A leaking ring - leaks no more
- From: psbr20252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [modeleng] Re: A leaking ring - leaks no more
- From: alan stepney
- [modeleng] SS Boiler
- From: Bede McCormack
- [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- From: kenny.macdougall
- [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- From: kenny.macdougall
- [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- From: Jesse Livingston
- [modeleng] Re: SS Boiler
- From: Eric Walker