[modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade <hww@xxxxxxxx>
- To: modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:25:23 -0500
At 11:03 PM 9/26/05 +0100, you wrote:
>Harry - did you mean a c spanner? - JohnP
John,
That's certainly one variation of it, I'm sitting here holding one of
those at this moment. It's for the nut which holds paper sanding and
grinding disks to the rubber backing disk on my angle grinder. The other
variation I had in mind is like a straight-legged calipers, with movable
leg(s).
Regards,
Harry
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- References:
- [modeleng] Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade
- [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: John Pagett
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- » [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- » [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- » [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- » [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- » [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- » [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- [modeleng] Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade
- [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: Harry Wade
- [modeleng] Re: [modeleng] Re: Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea
- From: John Pagett