> Gents, > > Modern fluid flow analysis has shown that the close fitting plunger in a > bore causes more problems than it's worth, at other than low piston > speeds. > Optimal piston speed is below our "normal running speed" of our models. > The > greatest efficiency was found to be with a plunger operating in a free > water > space of at least twice the displaced volume of the plunger. The factors > against the fitted plunger was due to the following factors; > > - Insufficient valve area due to limited space. To over come this, the > valves had to have a high lift. This in turn resulted in water being > pumped > back down the suction pipe (and/or into cylinder from the discharge valve) > for up to 30% of the compression stroke (this was worst on unsprung ball > valves). Vapour pressures were entered into in the worst cases (suction > pressures dropped low enough for the water to momentarily turn to steam). > > - Surge forces, due to rapid water flow in full cylinder, causing high > friction losses and extenuating valve opening time. > > > So, summing it all up......... > > You'd have a 1/2" plunger operating in a minimum 3/4" bore, with the > "O"ring > gland mounted as close to the water space as practical within the gland. > This can be a screw in (replaceable) gland/guide/support. The guide is > made > from an extension of the gland which is fed with oil. Two small grooves > are > placed, longitudinally, on the bearing area of the plunger carry oil. One > top and bottom. The large cylinder will accommodate larger valves > (preferably of the disc type), on the end if possible (with flow axis in > line with the plunger) with an area equal to the plunger diameter. > > This type of pump also allows for 2 different materials to be used for the > plunger, and hence compatible bearing materials may be used for the gland > and bearing area of the plunger. Especially since oil can be used as the > lubricant. > > > Cheers, > > Phill. > > PS Could someone please post this to the "modeleng" discussion group, > as > I have not yet had time to sort out my "why I can't post anything (after a > certain date) but receive fine" problem. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "alan stepney" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:07 AM > Subject: [modeleng] Re: Lapping, pumps, etc was > > >> I have used stainless, and a reamed bore, and not had any problems so >> far. >> >> I leave a reasonable clearance between the bore and ram so that the > packing >> is the only thing making contact. >> That should (??) prevent galling. >> >> A reamed bore seems to be sufficiently smooth to work OK and wear well. >> >> Alan >> >> MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. >> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, >> modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject > line. >> >> > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.