[modeleng] Re: Couplings
- From: "alanjstepney" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 02:10:02 -0000
John,
Thanks for that. It is just the information I needed.
Does anyone know if these dimensions are standard?
Is there, perhaps, any Federation (north or south) recommendation?
alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.alanstepney.info
Model Engineering, Steam Engine, and Railway technical pages.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Pagett" <john.pagett@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:51 PM
Subject: [modeleng] Re: Couplings and projects
Gents,
Couplings at Bromsgrove SME are "standardised" in that everyone makes
(or should) an adaptor bar which has two 6mm clearance holes 20mm apart
and is less than 1/8" thick.
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- References:
- [modeleng] Re: Alternatives for sleepers Jarrah now OT
- From: KJones9154
- [modeleng] Re: Alternatives for sleepers Jarrah now OT
- From: alanjstepney
- [modeleng] Re: Couplings and projects
- From: John Pagett
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- » [modeleng] Re: Couplings
- [modeleng] Re: Alternatives for sleepers Jarrah now OT
- From: KJones9154
- [modeleng] Re: Alternatives for sleepers Jarrah now OT
- From: alanjstepney
- [modeleng] Re: Couplings and projects
- From: John Pagett