[modeleng] Back to it
- From: Harry Wade <hww@xxxxxxxx>
- To: modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:59:02 -0500 (EST)
I've gotten back into the workshop this week after being away for a while and
rather than start in on my main project (the 2X Tich) I've decided to shake the
rust off by taking a short detour and do a Stuart D-10. The castings have have
been under the workbench for some time and are from early Jones & Bradburn (the
current owners) production and this is my first Stuart engine which has NOT
been out of the old Stuarts in Henley.
My first discovery was the prolonged "normalizing" process has apparently done
nothing to improve the main castings. These are rough and brittle and there is
an occasional dead white hard spot. Even with gentle machining chips of metal
break off any square edge which will need to be filled before painting. I
continue to find dimensional errors on the drawings which requires that I now
check through all the dimensions. If I wanted this kind of experience I could
have bought some old Clarksons castings, nevertheless, it won't build itself so
I will soldier on.
The first job was the crankshaft which in this kit is to be built up of mild
steel flat and rod. I actually prefer this method anyway, using Loctite &
pinned assembly, and the crankshaft has come out perfectly. I must admit that
I was never ever able to finish off one of the old drop-forged #10 engine
crankshafts without pretzelizing it and I wouldn't bother with one now. I have
another Stuart kit (a "Launch" engine) which is from the old Stuarts but which
includes a pre-brazed crankshaft, essentially a built-up version of the forged
crankshafts. I will probably go to a Loctited & pinned crankshaft on this one
also.
I'm presently shaping the bearings and in this version the drawing calls for
the middle bearing to be split, which of course is a necessity. Something I
don't care for however is they call for the middle bearing cap, which is on the
under-side of the shaft, to be loose and simply rest in the bearing slot and
rely upon being held captive in close quarters to hold the cap in place. Since
I don't have a ball-nosed milling cutter of the size needed to make the slot
as-designed I'll probably substitute a squarish split block in a squarish slot.
I plan to spiff the engine up a bit, extra detail in a few places, to make it
look a little less "Stuart-like", but not to go overboard. There was a chap
some years ago, "Anthony" IIRC, who spiffed up a Stuart #4 or #5 and #9 with
much more prototypical detail and they made beautiful engines and each was
featured on an ME cover at least once.
The Stuart 10's are thought of as beginner's engines but none are a piece of
cake, they force you to use almost the entire range of basic model engineering
skills. In 1982 Tom Walshaw began a series on ME entitled "Handmaiden" which
described the building of a Stuart H10 using only hand tools. He claimed it
took him very little longer than building with machine tools. One assumes he
had better castings.
Regards,
Harry
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
Other related posts: