[modeleng] Re: 4QD
- From: "R.L. Roebuck" <rlr20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:46:11 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Dennis Rayner wrote:
> They certainly don't want to TALK to
> anyone and I find that very customer unfriendly.
Hi there Dennis,
I know what you mean, but it is possible it's run as a sideline (ie the
person has a day job and so can't be on the phone during normal business
hours).
Also, as I've mentioned before, a lot of our model engineering suppliers
have more potential customers than they can deal with, so if they prefer
to be 'phone phobic' then that is their way of wittling down their
customer base to a more workable number.
I have to admit that as a professional engineer, I can see their point of
view. In a typical month I send out and respond to around a thousand work
related e-mails, ie circa 30 per day, which accounts for about two hours
of my day. There is no way that I could handle this volume of work
thoughput if it was all telephone based.
Ie they could just be being industrious rather then being on the phone all
day and billing their customers for the time spent on the phone by
putting their prices up. I'd certainly not let it get in the way of making
contact with them - they really sound like they know their stuff.
Yours,
Rich.
MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to,
modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- From: David Everett
- [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- From: Clif Walker
- References:
- [modeleng] 4QD
- From: Dennis Rayner
Other related posts:
- » [modeleng] 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- » [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- From: David Everett
- [modeleng] Re: 4QD
- From: Clif Walker
- [modeleng] 4QD
- From: Dennis Rayner