On Dienstag 02 Juni 2009 Richard Gregory wrote: > [...] > The only clue comes previous assemblies with earlier versions of Mira, > which produced much less redundancy, ie, was ~8000 contigs, now V2.9.43 > produces ~18000. Mapping this onto a reference showed ~1500 contigs > could be the same gene. Assembling the ~1500 contigs with cap3 > produced ~3 contigs, one containing hundreds of contigs. Hello Richard, hmmm ... sounds funny, indeed. Could you tell me the last version of MIRA with which you get "good" results and which version gives you troubles? I admit that I have been concentrating more on genome assemblies lately and perhaps a changed default parameter or a new algorithm behaves somewhat unexpectedly with cDNA. Regards, Bastien -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html