[mira_talk] Re: Fwd: ace file output from MIRA
- From: Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 20:15:38 +0200
On Mittwoch 13 Mai 2009 Lionel Guy wrote:
> [...]
> There is one single original tag that survived saving the assembly in
> consed, and it's the very last one in the original file (actually, the
> last lines of the file)(they are exactly the same in the two ace files,
> before and after saving):
Hi Lionel, (or Sven),
could you try and see whether
http://www.chevreux.org/tmp/mira_2.9.45x1_dev_linux-gnu_x86_64.tar.bz2
or
http://www.chevreux.org/tmp/mira_2.9.45x1_dev_linux-gnu_i686_32.tar.bz2
resolves parts of the problem? I.e., do the tags now appear in consed?
It may be that comments are not appearing correctly as I've not yet
implemented the COMMENT{} feature of ACE (which was new for me).
Additionally I've got a question: the docs for consed describe the possibility
to add comments for consensus tags ("Lionel was here" :-). Is this also
possible for read tags like in gap4? I didn't find anything related to this,
but it's actually quite an important feature for backbone assemblies using
annotated GenBank files. Could you please make a test in consed and paste the
resulting ACE file?
Regards,
Bastien
--
You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing
list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit
http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html
Other related posts: