Sunday, October 2, 2005, 5:03:46 PM, Stan Spiegel wrote: SS> Judy - Obama's statement was troubling. I expect someone who's a supreme SS> court justice to work at evening the playing field too -- seeing that SS> justice is done -- and that Obama saw a discrepancy between his words and SS> his actions makes me worry even more about him. In his other writings I saw SS> no support for civil rights, women's rights, gay rights either. I can't SS> understand someone who can't stand bullies who would support the strong over SS> the weak. I'm just hoping for the best. Stan, yes. He did help with one gay rights case, but that was his job (he could have said no, but it would have looked bad): the person he advised said he was very good. But that's a one-off. All else that I have read about Roberts and in a sense by him (e.g. arguments he wrote for the AG) is troubling in the extreme. The "best" is that he will not significantly erode current rights. Judy SS> S SS> ----- Original Message ----- SS> From: "Judy Evans" <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> SS> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> SS> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 6:56 PM SS> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: was that a slap in the kisser? >> Saturday, October 1, 2005, 6:33:36 PM, Stan Spiegel wrote: >> >> >> SS> I only hope he's a Souter in disguise. >> >> Hope on. (Google "Roberts" and "unenumerated rights".) >> >> >> >> SS> He's shown he knows how to make the >> SS> case for both liberal and conservative clients. >> >> He's a lawyer. >> >> SS> He's got the intellectual >> SS> firepower, experience, empathy (at least intellectual empathy). >> SS> Certainly >> SS> he's worrisome because he's kept his real viewpoints hidden from us, SS> except >> SS> what we've been able to glean from his writings. >> >> Correct. I repost my >> >> Here's Barack Obama's press release on why he'd be voting against >> Roberts: >> >> SS> http://obama.senate.gov/press/050922-remarks_of_senator_barack_obama_on_the_confirmation_of_judge_john_roberts/index.html >> >> >> >> and here are statements by Dianne Feinstein >> >> http://feinstein.senate.gov/legislation/supremecourt.html >> >> SS> Using "meager" to describe him throws me. >> >> I agree that meagre is not a good term unless one seeks to measure >> Roberts against the great justices. >> -- mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html