[lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:25:05 -0500
>>I would agree, but wasn't it Bush who declared right at the start
that it was a war of good vs evil.
After all that stuff about Brits being independent political thinkers,
why would you think Yanks are bound to every word and slogan of the Bush
administration? Just because I want us to get the upper hand in the Long
War doesn't mean I buy into Bush's theology or any statements he makes
to his political base. And I'm sure you see a variety of opinion from
the independent-minded Yanks on the list.
It's like asking why, since Churchill said "we will fight them on the
beaches..." you fought them in Cannes.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Andy Amago
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Andy Amago
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward