[lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:18:47 -0400
Eric Yost wrote:
"How about a Nietzschean transvaluation of values here? Back to root
assumptions."
Um, for Nietzsche there are no 'root' anythings. It's all surfaces.
Eric continues:
"Why higher standards?"
Channeling Hobbes, people are willing to give up a lot for the sake of
something better. Doesn't it seem self-defeating to lower one's standards
in order to convince others that it is better to get along than to fight?
Since the current unpleasantness can only have a political solution, why not
maintain as high a standard as is reasonable in order to make a political
solution as attractive as possible?
Sincerely,
Phil Enns
Glen Haven, NS
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- References:
- [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost