[lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: "Simon Ward" <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:31:44 -0000
"...only a decisive defeat of the enemy will bring about lasting peace."
Perhaps, but only to the extent that movement between the moderate and
fundamentalist groups is halted. If, as I feel is likely, the movement
between groups is impacted by the way the west conducts itself, then it
follows that the way the fundamentalists are halted will effect the
subsequent growth of that group. In summary, the west might be creating more
enemies than it is killing.
And I think this is the point Phil might be referring to: if the west lowers
its standards in dealing with the fundamentalists then it will be delaying,
or possibly denying, the possibility of bringing a halt to the fight.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Andy Amago
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Andy Amago
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost