[lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:41:25 -0500
>>How 'bout you Eric? Fancy a go. How do you feel about your government
channelling cash to Sunni terrorist organisations?
Not sure I buy into Hersch on this one, especially since his sources are
always "ex" something or other, ex-CIA, ex-government. But assume it's
true, in which case it's stupid. Blowback is too likely. And the Sunni
terrorists are canny, so unless we're going to target and exterminate
the vast majority of them at once, they'll get the advantage from it.
And you, Simon, how do you feel about your government using biological
weapons (smallpox) during the French and Indian War? Sir Jeffrey
Amherst, I think...
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Judith Evans
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Andy Amago
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Judith Evans
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Andy Amago
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Traditionalist Islam
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Simon Ward