[lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:48:17 -0400
Eric Yost wrote:
"I meant 'our' root assumptions: me contextualizing ..."
Ah. Your mention of "a Nietzschean transvaluation of values" is a bit
misleading, then.
Eric again:
"Attractive to whom?"
You mentioned that you were interested in a moral, not political,
discussion. 'To whom?' is a political question. Again, a bit misleading.
I am interested in the moral bit.
Sincerely,
Phil Enns
Glen Haven, NS
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- » [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- [lit-ideas] Re: the standard for higher standards
- From: Eric Yost