From: "Paul Stone" <pas@xxxxxxxx> > This is the +PRIMARY+ objection I have to "intelligent design". It just > doesn't seem too > intelligent. That's perhaps the best argument against "intelligent design"; it's too random to be intelligent. Two dozen types of eyes, thousands of different kinds of sea plankton that all do the same thing, an Earth that has been bombarded by massive asteroids and all life forms nearly wiped out some six times: that's not design in any meaningful sense. yrs, andreas www.andreas.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html