[lit-ideas] [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- From: Carol Kirschenbaum <carolkir@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:36:12 -0700
Skewing observable facts to support one's own argument is hardly limited to
Conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation. But dear me, this
report cites the fact that The Poor have color televisions as testament to
their relatively opulent lifestyle in America.
Find a b&w TV these days. Really. Color TV sounds opulent, all right, but
the truth is, color TVs are industry norm. (I paid $50 for mine, last year.)
Along the same lines, the report tells us that a majority of The Poor have
air conditioning--up from 36%, I think it was--30 years ago. Again, look at
the context--demographic shifts, in the past 30 years, to the American
Southwest, thanks to AC. (Would people move back up north if there were no
AC in areas that reach 100-plus degrees? With the price of fuel now, we may
soon find out.)
Ditto for cars. Three-quarters of The Poor have cars, the report says.
Let's suppose this is true, and let's suppose, for the sake of argument,
that The Poor who were interviewed for this report represents people in
shelters and such. What's the proportion of The Poor, a la Heritage, who
live in congested cities like NY, Chicago, DC, where The Middle Rich don't
usually have cars? So they're talking about the suburban/rural poor, then.
Not the elderly or disabled, who can't drive. The other third, without cars,
are working age but don't work--the Idle Class, as this report implies.
It seems the Heritage folks are talking about welfare, specifically, women
with dependent kids. The focus is on absent fathers and mothers who don't
work "enough." Presumably, the report claims, more hours of work would lift
this family out of poverty. More hours at minimum-wage jobs? Who takes care
of those dependent children? Mom, if only Dad would come to his senses and
be a responsible family guy.
But why doesn't it work this way? Sounds reasonable enough, right? That's
the problem with this Heritage Foundation report, in a nutshell: They had
the solution before they wrote, they thought, and they filled in the blanks
with stats (many out of context) that supported their conclusions.
Lawrence, I hope your reading on Muslims has more power to it than this.
Carol
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- From: Lawrence Helm
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- » [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-id] The Poverty of Heritage
- From: Lawrence Helm