[lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- From: Andy <mimi.erva@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sounds like Phil doesn't want to hear about oil getting expensive. You're in
good company Phil. Neither does Congress. The American people (that mythical
entity the invocation of whom is tantamount to a divine visitation (Fareed
Zakaria c/o Morris)), the American people are clueless, oblivious. Oil is
getting expensive is what you don't want to hear about, right Phil? BTW,
here's the headline about the $142 oil; they're still blaming the falling
dollar. That's a good thing to blame, isn't it Phil? Maybe we should rename
the dollar the SUV? As of this writing oil is $140.74.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12400801
--- On Fri, 6/27/08, Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 1:16 PM
Paul Stone wrote:
"When I was in University all of us [boys] were trying to shoot our
guns at the tunnels of coochee lined up before our eyes."
'Tunnels of coochee'?
Terrible.
There should be rules against this sort of aesthetic abomination. I
know there are contests for this sort of writing but this list should
have some standards. I vote that for a day Paul has to respond to
every post from 'Andy' as punishment.
Phil Enns
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- From: Phil Enns
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- » [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- [lit-ideas] Re: constittional rights
- From: Phil Enns