[lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:54:30 -0800
Once again again so as not
To assemble another fallacy
Assuming anyone here
Might know the difference
Between Islam and Islamism . . .
Islam is the whole thing,
The Civilization. Just as here
In the West the West
Is the whole thing.
Militant Islam is that part
Of the Islamic Civilization
That is engaged in Militant
Activity either opposing
The US & the West
Or disruptive in such a way
As to affect and threaten
The allies of the US.
The Rogue State once led
By Saddam Hussein
Was the Most Militant of all,
The most threatening,
The most dangerous,
The most disruptive
State in the Middle East.
Surely it was good
To end it before
It transmogrified even
Further. I wish the Left
Could manage to quit
Quibbling about dotting
"I's" and crossing "t's"
Of an International arrangement
Developed at the end
Of World War II and admit
They wish the US defeated,
Or maybe just this US led by Bush,
And these troops, and these issues;
So that we can be knocked down
Several rungs and maybe finally agree
To accept the leadership of the UN
Led by France and Germany
And Russia. If only he had survived
And we continued to war with him
In the air until he finally managed
To hit some of our planes we might
Have kept on spending billions
To protect the Kurds and Shiites
While he worked the French and Germans
And Russians until he got what he wanted
And the Left got what it wanted,
And France and Germany and
Russia got what they wanted and
America was properly scourged and
All ears turned to the piping call
Of the world-peace-piper gathering
Everyone into his perfect Land of Love.
Lawrence
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:58 PM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
<<Okay, time to fess up. It was me. I did it. I approved the war against
Militant Islam. It was the right thing to do and still is. It's not like
I was having a bad day. Really put thought into it. Weighed the
alternatives. Pondered. Paced a bit. And I approved it. Big stamp with
red ink pressing out the word APPROVED inside a rectangular red ink
frame. That was me.>>
Damn, and I thought it was *me*. Everything from the expulsion of Adam &
Eve from the garden to world hunger is because of me, my children will tell
you. (I've tried the "having a bad day excuse, but the response seems to
be, 'how many bad days can one woman have??). Oh, I mean, I'm so glad it
wasn't me!
What I really mean is, evil and sadistic and vile as Hussein was, he neither
represented, assisted, nor sponsored Militant Islam. Could we please try to
keep that fundamental difference straight if we're to discuss any of the
incredible ME confusion with any clarity at all?
No one pushed Shock & Awe on Baghdad because they thought NYC or CA or WA or
anywhere else in the continental US would be safer from Islamic Militants
(Militant Islamics?) as a result. But the administration *did* take
advantage of a) the incredible fear factor immediately following 9/11 and b)
the overwhelming ignorance on the part of the U.S. population to invade a
country for its own profit (political and financial profit) and in so doing
strengthened Militant Islam hugely. Dem's and Rep's alike were fear-blinded
sheep, grazing, led to the slaughter of so many, manipulated.
Just my two cents' worth.
Julie Krueger
being iced-on yet again in the midwest -- it really has to stop this.
sometime. soon. sooner than soon.
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] These leftists?
- From: Eric
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- From: JimKandJulieB
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- » [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- [lit-ideas] These leftists?
- From: Eric
- [lit-ideas] Re: comments the DEMs must defend
- From: JimKandJulieB