[lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: "BOROWIK LUCIENE" <luborowik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:01:50 -0500
Oh I love your posts!
> Omar, you my Googlist? No, but I hoped you would serve as one of my
Boolean
> conditionals. You usually have web information on hand and it seems to be
> seldom mentioned by partisans on one side or the other. Also you might
have
> responded with a list of what you considered biased or inaccurate
assessments of such
> funding.
> By the way, the German search-engine Apollo-7 (http://www.apollo7.de/) is
> also very good and worth investigating. As is Proteus, which searches
Google and
> many others at http://www.thrall.org/proteus.html
>
> Eric
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: Scribe1865
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: Scribe1865