[lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: Scribe1865@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:57:37 EST
In a message dated 3/28/2004 11:52:35 PM Eastern Standard Time,
omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Am I expected to be your Google operator ?
Omar, you my Googlist? No, but I hoped you would serve as one of my Boolean
conditionals. You usually have web information on hand and it seems to be
seldom mentioned by partisans on one side or the other. Also you might have
responded with a list of what you considered biased or inaccurate assessments
of such
funding.
By the way, the German search-engine Apollo-7 (http://www.apollo7.de/) is
also very good and worth investigating. As is Proteus, which searches Google
and
many others at http://www.thrall.org/proteus.html
Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: BOROWIK LUCIENE
- [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: Omar Kusturica
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: BOROWIK LUCIENE
- [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: Omar Kusturica