[lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:49:33 -0800 (PST)
--- carol kirschenbaum <cskir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Revisiting an old issue,
> do you believe that Salman Rushdie's literary
> creation in _Satanic Verses_
> [Mohammed's erotic dream] was racist and
> anti-Islamic? A fatwa--those were
> the good ol' days. We all took our time back then,
> and really played a
> situation for its dramatic import.
*I am afraid that I have not read the Satanic Verses,
so I cannot tell. Mohammad's erotic dream would not
necessarily be anti-Islamic, as some of the Haddith
feature Mohammad as being quite sexually active. Wish
that I were him.
O.K.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: carol kirschenbaum
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- » [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- [lit-ideas] Re: bombing for sex
- From: carol kirschenbaum