[lit-ideas] an onto-heno-chrono-phenomenology of the thingliness of the thing new trends in heidegger studies

osted by Angelo on Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Labels: Heidegger / Comments: (0)
Andrew Haas
Gewalt and Metalepsis: On Heidegger and the Greeks

Résumé
Cet article cherche à interroger Heidegger en tant que traducteur. Nous montrons d?abord que le refus de traduire hypokeimenon par subiectum rend possible une onto-héno-chrono-phénoménologie de la choséité de la chose comme constance. Ensuite, nous démontrons que la tentative visant à penser la transformation de l?aletheia ne peut éviter la traduction et toutes ses violences. Enfin, nous faisons retour aux Grecs en vue de penser la traduction comme metalepsis, de réinterpréter la traduction platonicienne des Idées comme choses, de repenser le nous aristotélicien comme auto-traducteur, et de suggérer que l?origine de la pensée réside peut-être aussi dans la traduction. 

Abstract
This article seeks to interrogate Heidegger as translator. First we show that the refusal to translate hypokeimenon as subiectum, opens up the possibility of an onto-heno-chrono-phenomenology of the thingliness of the thing as constancy. Second we demonstrate that the attempt to think a transformation of aletheia cannot avoid translation and all its violences. Finally we return to the Greeks in order to think translation as metalepsis, to reinterpret the Platonic translation of ideas as things, to rethink the Aristotelian nous as self-translating, and to suggest that the origin of thinking may lie in translation as well. On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Phil Enns wrote: 


Robert Paul wrote:

"For, in the case of Heidegger, his acceptance and support of National
Socialism is not irrelevant to his work, for his work is an expression
of that very sort of Fascism, indeed, so much so that without his
acceptance and support of the political and social policies of such
Fascism, his work would not be what it is."

The problem, as I see it, is that the above is not philosophical.  It
may very well be true, but I can't find a way of articulating it as a
philosophical point.  I find no contradiction in defending Heidegger's
philosophical arguments and believing he was a bastard.


Sincerely,

Phil Enns
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html



|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
?e ??, ?????e?? ?a?eda?µ?????? ? ? ? ?t? t?de
?e?µe?a, t??? ?e???? ??µas? pe???µe???.
/begin/read__>sig.file: postal address
palma
University of KwaZulu-Natal Philosophy
3rd floor of Memorial Tower Building
Howard College Campus
Durban 4041
South Africa
Tel off: [+27] 031 2601591 (sec: Mrs. Yolanda Hordyk) [+27] 031-2602292
Fax [+27] 031-2603031
mobile 07 62 36 23 91            calling from overseas +[27] 76 2362391
EMAIL: palma@xxxxxxxx
EMAIL: palma@xxxxxxxxxx

MY OFFICE IS A290@Mtb



*only when in Europe*: inst. J. Nicod
29 rue d'Ulm
f-75005 paris france
email me for details if needed at palma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
________
This e-mail message (and attachments) is confidential, and/or privileged and is 
intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail 
you must not copy,
distribute, take any action in reliance on it or disclose it to anyone. Any 
confidentiality or
privilege is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you.
This entity is not responsible for any information not related to the business 
of this entity. If you
received this e-mail in error please destroy the original and notify the sender.

Other related posts: