[lit-ideas] Re: amazing employment application questions
- From: John Wager <john.wager1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:12:44 -0500
JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx wrote:
So, let's say I'm paralyzed from the waist down in a wheelchair, but
my clerical skills are outstanding (if I do say so myself). So
they're asking me if I am able to perform the clerical duties if the
building does not have wheelchair access?
They're asking you if you can perform your duties in a wheelchair IF
THEY MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS, which means if they make the
building wheelchair-accessible. That's THEIR responsibility; they are
REQUIRED to make such reasonable accommodations.
"Reasonable accommodations" seems, well, reasonable to me. When I
served on hiring committees for faculty, we were required to ask at the
end something like this: "This job requires standing or sitting before
classes for several hours; do you feel you are able to meet these job
requirements with reasonable accommodations?" Nobody ever said no,
although several people were a bit taken aback by the question. (I must
say that if two candidates were of equal qualifications, maybe the one
who at least knew about the idea of reasonable accommodations might get
a slight edge.)
I was once asked to make "reasonable accommodations" for a deaf student
in my class. She didn't want an interpreter that would translate my
class on the fly into sign language; all she wanted was for me to shave
my mustache a bit higher so she could see my upper lip to do lip
reading. This seemed quite reasonable to me, so for the rest of the
semester I was a bit less shaggy in my mustache than I might have been.
--
-------------------------------------------------
"Never attribute to malice that which can be
explained by incompetence and ignorance."
-------------------------------------------------
John Wager john.wager1@xxxxxxxxxxx
Lisle, IL, USA
Other related posts: