[lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- From: Paul Stone <pas@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:59:25 -0400
At 12:52 PM 10/18/2005, you wrote:
Sounds like excusative associative transference.
Yeah, so? You got a problem with excusative associative transference?
I didn't when I made it up 20 minutes ago, but now I'm thinking I might.
mixing up the medicine,
p
##########
Paul Stone
pas@xxxxxxxx
Kingsville, ON, Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- From: Eric Yost
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: a must see
- From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] a must not hear
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- From: Eric Yost
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] a must not hear
- » [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- » [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- » [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- » [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- » [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- » [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
Sounds like excusative associative transference.
Yeah, so? You got a problem with excusative associative transference?
I didn't when I made it up 20 minutes ago, but now I'm thinking I might.
- [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: a must see
- From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] a must not hear
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: a must not hear
- From: Eric Yost